>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv1 4/6] vfio: initialize IOMMUFDDevice and pass to
>vIOMMU
>
>On 15/01/2024 10:13, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> index 9bfddc1360..cbd035f148 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ static int iommufd_cdev_attach(const char *name,
>VFIODevice *vbasedev,
>> VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer;
>> VFIOIOMMUFDContainer *container;
>> VFIOAddressSpace *space;
>> + IOMMUFDDevice *idev = &vbasedev->idev;
>> struct vfio_device_info dev_info = { .argsz = sizeof(dev_info) };
>> int ret, devfd;
>> uint32_t ioas_id;
>> @@ -428,6 +429,7 @@ found_container:
>> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&bcontainer->device_list, vbasedev,
>container_next);
>> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&vfio_device_list, vbasedev, global_next);
>>
>> + iommufd_device_init(idev, sizeof(*idev), container->be, vbasedev-
>>devid);
>> trace_iommufd_cdev_device_info(vbasedev->name, devfd, vbasedev-
>>num_irqs,
>> vbasedev->num_regions, vbasedev->flags);
>> return 0;
>
>In the dirty tracking series, I'll need to fetch out_capabilities from device
>and do a bunch of stuff that is used when allocating hwpt to ask for dirty
>tracking. And this means having iommufd_device_init() be called before we
>call
>iommufd_cdev_attach_container().
>
>Here's what it looks based on an earlier version of your patch:
>
>https://github.com/jpemartins/qemu/commit/433f97a05e0cdd8e3b8563a
>a20e4f22d107219b5
>
>I can move the call earlier in my series, unless there's something specifically
>when you call it here?
I think it's safe to move it earlier, just remember to do the same for existing
container.
Thanks
Zhenzhong
