Anthony Liguori writes: [...] > For v2, I'm relying on a fork of gtk-doc that removes the underscore > requirements. I really hate to do this but I like it better than not having > documentation. I'm poking in the gtk+ community to see if there's an upstream > compromise possible.
I don't want to start any kind of flame, but did you consider the possibility of using doxygen instead? >From my experience, it's pretty complete and also contains all kinds of predefined keywords for documenting pre/post-conditions, notes, warnings, etc. Besides, it offers the possibility to document "things" separately from the code (e.g., auto-generated structures, or elements declared differently depending on defines), which I was unable to do with some quick tests I had with gtkdoc. Lluis -- "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn something new, the whole world becomes that much richer." -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom Tollbooth
