On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:59 PM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei....@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/14/2024 10:54 AM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:39 PM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei....@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> Introduce new API. No functional change on existing API.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei....@oracle.com>
> > I'm ok with the new function, but doesn't the compiler complain
> > because adding a static function is not used?
> Hmmm, which one? vhost_vdpa_net_get_nc_vdpa is used by
> vhost_vdpa_net_first_nc_vdpa internally, and
> vhost_vdpa_net_first_nc_vdpa is used by vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_start (Patch
> 01). I think we should be fine?
>

Ouch, you're totally right.

Reviewed-by: Eugenio Pérez <epere...@redhat.com>

Thanks!

> -Siwei
> >
> >> ---
> >>   net/vhost-vdpa.c | 13 +++++++++----
> >>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> index 06c83b4..4168cad 100644
> >> --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> @@ -281,13 +281,18 @@ static ssize_t vhost_vdpa_receive(NetClientState 
> >> *nc, const uint8_t *buf,
> >>   }
> >>
> >>
> >> -/** From any vdpa net client, get the netclient of the first queue pair */
> >> -static VhostVDPAState *vhost_vdpa_net_first_nc_vdpa(VhostVDPAState *s)
> >> +/** From any vdpa net client, get the netclient of the i-th queue pair */
> >> +static VhostVDPAState *vhost_vdpa_net_get_nc_vdpa(VhostVDPAState *s, int 
> >> i)
> >>   {
> >>       NICState *nic = qemu_get_nic(s->nc.peer);
> >> -    NetClientState *nc0 = qemu_get_peer(nic->ncs, 0);
> >> +    NetClientState *nc_i = qemu_get_peer(nic->ncs, i);
> >> +
> >> +    return DO_UPCAST(VhostVDPAState, nc, nc_i);
> >> +}
> >>
> >> -    return DO_UPCAST(VhostVDPAState, nc, nc0);
> >> +static VhostVDPAState *vhost_vdpa_net_first_nc_vdpa(VhostVDPAState *s)
> >> +{
> >> +    return vhost_vdpa_net_get_nc_vdpa(s, 0);
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   static void vhost_vdpa_net_log_global_enable(VhostVDPAState *s, bool 
> >> enable)
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >>
>


Reply via email to