From: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com> Currently ts_tid contains the parent tid after fork(), which is not correct. So far it has not affected anything, but the upcoming follow-fork-mode child support relies on the correct value, so fix it.
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> Message-Id: <20240219141628.246823-4-...@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> --- bsd-user/main.c | 1 + linux-user/main.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsd-user/main.c b/bsd-user/main.c index 512d4ab69fc..e39eef3040f 100644 --- a/bsd-user/main.c +++ b/bsd-user/main.c @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ void fork_end(int child) * state, so we don't need to end_exclusive() here. */ qemu_init_cpu_list(); + get_task_state(thread_cpu)->ts_tid = qemu_get_thread_id(); gdbserver_fork(thread_cpu); } else { mmap_fork_end(child); diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c index 551acf16619..699da773714 100644 --- a/linux-user/main.c +++ b/linux-user/main.c @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ void fork_end(int child) } } qemu_init_cpu_list(); + get_task_state(thread_cpu)->ts_tid = qemu_get_thread_id(); gdbserver_fork(thread_cpu); } else { cpu_list_unlock(); -- 2.39.2