On 3/17/24 12:14, Sven Schnelle wrote:
Otherwise the first instruction at the new location gets executed from
the old space.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <sv...@stackframe.org>
---
target/hppa/translate.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/hppa/translate.c b/target/hppa/translate.c
index 58d7ec1ade..a09112e4ae 100644
--- a/target/hppa/translate.c
+++ b/target/hppa/translate.c
@@ -3777,6 +3777,9 @@ static bool trans_be(DisasContext *ctx, arg_be *a)
}
copy_iaoq_entry(ctx, cpu_iaoq_b, -1, tmp);
tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_b, new_spc);
+ if (a->n) {
+ tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_f, new_spc);
+ }
nullify_set(ctx, a->n);
}
tcg_gen_lookup_and_goto_ptr();
Without use_nullify_skip(), we're going to execute the next instruction even if we know it
is nullified (a->n). This is usually because there's a page crossing or breakpoint, and
we need to take the exception that might be raised there.
So, we advance the queue:
copy_iaoq_entry(ctx, cpu_iaoq_f, ctx->iaoq_b, cpu_iaoq_b);
if (ctx->iaoq_b == -1) {
tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_f, cpu_iasq_b);
}
then put the branch destination at the back of the queue:
copy_iaoq_entry(ctx, cpu_iaoq_b, -1, tmp);
tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_iasq_b, new_spc);
Note that iaoq_b is always -1 on a space change.
So your change does not look correct.
What is the issue that you saw?
r~