Il mer 27 mar 2024, 13:42 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> ha scritto:
> IIUC your comment, you are worried about system headers declaring > non-static inline functions? > No, it's just that the flag (and thus the patch) is not doing what the commit message says. Perhaps you could instead add a checkpatch test that catches occurrences of inline without static. Paolo > > > > For now I'm queuing patches 1-3 only. > > > > Paolo > > > >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> > >> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> > >> Message-Id: <20240313184954.42513-5-phi...@linaro.org> > >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> meson.build | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build > >> index c9c3217ba4..f400f7d36c 100644 > >> --- a/meson.build > >> +++ b/meson.build > >> @@ -591,6 +591,7 @@ warn_flags = [ > >> '-Wold-style-definition', > >> '-Wredundant-decls', > >> '-Wshadow=local', > >> + '-Wstatic-in-inline', > >> '-Wstrict-prototypes', > >> '-Wtype-limits', > >> '-Wundef', > > > >