Il mer 27 mar 2024, 13:42 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> ha
scritto:

> IIUC your comment, you are worried about system headers declaring
> non-static inline functions?
>

No, it's just that the flag (and thus the patch) is not doing what the
commit message says.

Perhaps you could instead add a checkpatch test that catches occurrences of
inline without static.

Paolo


> >
> > For now I'm queuing patches 1-3 only.
> >
> > Paolo
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> >> Message-Id: <20240313184954.42513-5-phi...@linaro.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>   meson.build | 1 +
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
> >> index c9c3217ba4..f400f7d36c 100644
> >> --- a/meson.build
> >> +++ b/meson.build
> >> @@ -591,6 +591,7 @@ warn_flags = [
> >>     '-Wold-style-definition',
> >>     '-Wredundant-decls',
> >>     '-Wshadow=local',
> >> +  '-Wstatic-in-inline',
> >>     '-Wstrict-prototypes',
> >>     '-Wtype-limits',
> >>     '-Wundef',
> >
>
>

Reply via email to