On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:33:58PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:33:58 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berra...@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tests: add testing of parameter=1 for SMP topology
>
> Validate that it is possible to pass 'parameter=1' for any SMP topology
> parameter, since unsupported parameters are implicitly considered to
> always have a value of 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> index 56165e6644..56ce5128f1 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> @@ -330,6 +330,14 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_valid[] = {
> .config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, 8, T, 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 16),
> .expect_prefer_sockets = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 4, 2, 16),
> .expect_prefer_cores = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 4, 2, 16),
> + }, {
> + /*
> + * Unsupported parameters are always allowed to be set to '1'
> + * config: -smp
> 8,books=1,drawers=1,sockets=2,modules=1,dies=1,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=8
> + * expect: cpus=8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2,maxcpus=8 */
> + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_FULL_TOPO(8, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 8),
> + .expect_prefer_sockets = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 2, 2, 8),
> + .expect_prefer_cores = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 2, 2, 8),
> },
> };
>
As Xiaoyao's suggestion, only the nit in the comment.
Others look good to me, so,
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1....@intel.com>
