On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:07:27 +0000
"Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)" <yaoxt.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:

> ping again.

Sorry for delay - I was waiting for some of the tree I'm carrying
to get picked up before applying anything new.

I haven't yet tested this as fully as I'd like for upstreaming, but
with that in mind applied to my cxl staging tree. 

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yao, Xingtao/姚 幸涛 <yaoxt.f...@fujitsu.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 5:31 PM
> > To: Yao, Xingtao/姚 幸涛 <yaoxt.f...@fujitsu.com>;
> > jonathan.came...@huawei.com; fan...@samsung.com
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] mem/cxl_type3: support 3, 6, 12 and 16 interleave 
> > ways
> > 
> > ping.
> >   
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.f...@fujitsu.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 8:53 AM
> > > To: jonathan.came...@huawei.com; fan...@samsung.com
> > > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Yao, Xingtao/姚 幸涛 <yaoxt.f...@fujitsu.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH v3] mem/cxl_type3: support 3, 6, 12 and 16 interleave ways
> > >
> > > Since the kernel does not check the interleave capability, a
> > > 3-way, 6-way, 12-way or 16-way region can be create normally.
> > >
> > > Applications can access the memory of 16-way region normally because
> > > qemu can convert hpa to dpa correctly for the power of 2 interleave
> > > ways, after kernel implementing the check, this kind of region will
> > > not be created any more.
> > >
> > > For non power of 2 interleave ways, applications could not access the
> > > memory normally and may occur some unexpected behaviors, such as
> > > segmentation fault.
> > >
> > > So implements this feature is needed.
> > >
> > > Link:
> > >  
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/3e84b919-7631-d1db-3e1d-33000f3f3868@fujits
> >   
> > > u.com/
> > > Signed-off-by: Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.f...@fujitsu.com>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c |  9 +++++++--
> > >  hw/mem/cxl_type3.c           | 15 +++++++++++----
> > >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > index cd116c0401..473895948b 100644
> > > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c
> > > @@ -243,8 +243,13 @@ static void hdm_init_common(uint32_t *reg_state,
> > > uint32_t *write_msk,
> > >      ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > > INTERLEAVE_4K, 1);
> > >      ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > >                       POISON_ON_ERR_CAP, 0);
> > > -    ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > > 3_6_12_WAY, 0);
> > > -    ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,  
> > 16_WAY,  
> > > 0);
> > > +    if (type == CXL2_TYPE3_DEVICE) {
> > > +        ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > > 3_6_12_WAY, 1);
> > > +        ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > > 16_WAY, 1);
> > > +    } else {
> > > +        ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > > 3_6_12_WAY, 0);
> > > +        ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > > 16_WAY, 0);
> > > +    }
> > >      ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY, UIO,  
> > 0);  
> > >      ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(reg_state, CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY,
> > >                       UIO_DECODER_COUNT, 0);
> > > diff --git a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> > > index 3e42490b6c..b755318838 100644
> > > --- a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> > > +++ b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> > > @@ -804,10 +804,17 @@ static bool cxl_type3_dpa(CXLType3Dev *ct3d, hwaddr
> > > host_addr, uint64_t *dpa)
> > >              continue;
> > >          }
> > >
> > > -        *dpa = dpa_base +
> > > -            ((MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, 8 + ig) & hpa_offset) |
> > > -             ((MAKE_64BIT_MASK(8 + ig + iw, 64 - 8 - ig - iw) & 
> > > hpa_offset)  
> > > -              >> iw));  
> > > +        if (iw < 8) {
> > > +            *dpa = dpa_base +
> > > +                ((MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, 8 + ig) & hpa_offset) |
> > > +                 ((MAKE_64BIT_MASK(8 + ig + iw, 64 - 8 - ig - iw) &  
> > hpa_offset)  
> > > +                  >> iw));
> > > +        } else {
> > > +            *dpa = dpa_base +
> > > +                ((MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, 8 + ig) & hpa_offset) |
> > > +                 ((((MAKE_64BIT_MASK(ig + iw, 64 - ig - iw) & hpa_offset)
> > > +                   >> (ig + iw)) / 3) << (ig + 8)));
> > > +        }
> > >
> > >          return true;
> > >      }
> > > --
> > > 2.37.3  
> 
> 


Reply via email to