Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: > Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach. From > there we can potentially generate ASN.1 BER/DER visitors for the protocol > side, or potentially even just vmstate bindings as a start. I've recently > started looking into the latter... it's completely feasible, the only > downside is it complicates the IDL due requiring support for a lot of > what are very much vmstate-specific items, but it should be possible to > do this in a manner where those annotations are self-contained and > ignorable if we opted to replace vmstate-style declarations.
We can also keep the current vmstate descriptions, but access fields from the automatically-generated visitors instead of struct fields. This keeps the IDL simple. Paolo
