On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:11:55PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/8/24 16:56, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The eBPF code is currently reporting error messages through trace
> > events. Trace events are fine for debugging, but they are not to be
> > considered the primary error reporting mechanism, as their output
> > is inaccessible to callers.
> > 
> > This adds an "Error **errp" parameter to all methods which have
> > important error scenarios to report to the caller.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   ebpf/ebpf_rss.c     | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >   ebpf/ebpf_rss.h     | 10 +++++---
> >   hw/net/virtio-net.c |  7 +++---
> >   3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c b/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > index aa7170d997..59854c8b51 100644
> > --- a/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > +++ b/ebpf/ebpf_rss.c
> > @@ -47,13 +47,14 @@ bool ebpf_rss_is_loaded(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> >       return ctx != NULL && (ctx->obj != NULL || ctx->program_fd != -1);
> >   }
> > -static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> > +static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx, Error **errp)
> >   {
> >       ctx->mmap_configuration = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> >                                      PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
> >                                      ctx->map_configuration, 0);
> >       if (ctx->mmap_configuration == MAP_FAILED) {
> >           trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF configuration 
> > array");
> > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF configuration array");
> >           return false;
> >       }
> >       ctx->mmap_toeplitz_key = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> >                                      ctx->map_toeplitz_key, 0);
> >       if (ctx->mmap_toeplitz_key == MAP_FAILED) {
> >           trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF toeplitz key");
> > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF toeplitz array");
> >           goto toeplitz_fail;
> >       }
> >       ctx->mmap_indirections_table = mmap(NULL, qemu_real_host_page_size(),
> > @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ static bool ebpf_rss_mmap(struct EBPFRSSContext *ctx)
> >                                      ctx->map_indirections_table, 0);
> >       if (ctx->mmap_indirections_table == MAP_FAILED) {
> >           trace_ebpf_error("eBPF RSS", "can not mmap eBPF indirection 
> > table");
> > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to map eBPF indirection array");
> 
> Aren't these trace_ebpf_error() calls redundant now?

Yes & no. Errors propagated up the call stack don't get included in
any trace output, and so if a caller doesn't log them anywhere they
can thus be invisible to someone just looking at trace output.

I could remove them all from the eBPF code though, and put a single
trace event in the hw/net/virtio-net.c file instead ? Bit of a bike
shed colouring exercise to decide which is best though.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


Reply via email to