Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 12:50:26PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
[...] >> > It is confusing that we have both shared stuff and QMP schema >> > only stuff under the same location. >> >> Which stuff in which location? > > There are multiple directories with 'qapi' in their name > > - $SRC/include/qapi - all generic stuff for any consumer of QAPI > - $SRC/qapi - impl of generic stuff from $SRC/include/qapi, but > also the QMP schema for machine emulator > - $BUILD/qapi - generated code for QMP schema for machine emulator - scripts/qapi - the generator code > > I find it confusing that we have both generic QAPI code and the main > machine emulator QMP schema in directories sharing the same 'qapi' > name. Got it. Lack of separation between generic C infrastructure and specific schema hasn't really annoyed me. Possibly because the two are, for better or worse, joined at the hip. Except for the use of "qapi:" in commit message titles; there I've at times felt a slight urge to distinguish between schema work, C infrastructure work, and generator work. Of course, other people's confusion trumps my non-annoyance.
