On 8/16/24 16:56, Deepak Gupta wrote:
+ c_sspush 011 0 00001 00000 01 rs2=1 rs1=0 # c.sspush x1 carving out
of zcmops
+ c_sspopchk 011 0 00101 00000 01 rs1=5 rd=0 # c.sspopchk x5 carving
out of zcmops
...
This indirection is pointless. Have the decoder invoke the proper insn in the first
place. Identically with how we're treating 'addi', for instance.
I was getting compilation error. How to reconcile with arugment sets between
insn32.decode and insn16.decode. Earlier I was doing that and didn't need it.
But after removing indirection in arguments and using single use format, type
for
structs instruction arguments ends up conflicting and compiler complains.
Ah, for that you need to use named argument sets. In this case,
sspush .... &r2_s rs2=1 rs1=0
sspopchk .... &r2 rs2=5 rd=0
in both insn32.decode and insn16.decode
r~
