Before making additional modification, tidy up this misleading indentation.

Reviewed-by: Ankit Agrawal <ank...@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.hu...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
---
 hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c b/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c
index 3d2b567999..4a02c19468 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static int build_all_acpi_generic_initiators(Object *obj, 
void *opaque)
 
     dev_handle.segment = 0;
     dev_handle.bdf = PCI_BUILD_BDF(pci_bus_num(pci_get_bus(pci_dev)),
-                                               pci_dev->devfn);
+                                   pci_dev->devfn);
 
     build_srat_generic_pci_initiator_affinity(table_data,
                                               gi->node, &dev_handle);
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to