On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:13:29 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+hua...@kernel.org> wrote:
> HEST source ID is actually a 16-bit value. Yet, make it a little
> bit more generic using just an integer type.
wouldn't uint16_t be better to use, to explicitly show expectations?
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+hua...@kernel.org>
> ---
> hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c | 2 +-
> hw/acpi/ghes.c | 2 +-
> include/hw/acpi/ghes.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c b/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c
> index c315de1802d6..58a04e935142 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> #include "hw/acpi/ghes.h"
>
> -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint8_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> +int acpi_ghes_record_errors(int source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> {
> return -1;
> }
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes.c b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> index 6e5f0e8cf0c9..4e34b16a6ca9 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ void acpi_ghes_add_fw_cfg(AcpiGhesState *ags, FWCfgState
> *s,
> ags->present = true;
> }
>
> -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint8_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> +int acpi_ghes_record_errors(int source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> {
> uint64_t hest_read_ack_start_addr, read_ack_start_addr;
> uint64_t hest_addr, cper_addr, err_source_struct;
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> index 7485f54c28f2..6471934d7775 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void acpi_build_hest(GArray *table_data, GArray
> *hardware_errors,
> const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id);
> void acpi_ghes_add_fw_cfg(AcpiGhesState *vms, FWCfgState *s,
> GArray *hardware_errors);
> -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint8_t source_id,
> +int acpi_ghes_record_errors(int source_id,
> uint64_t error_physical_addr);
> void ghes_record_cper_errors(const void *cper, size_t len,
> uint16_t source_id, Error **errp);
