Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:

> Il lun 21 ott 2024, 12:39 Junjie Mao <junjie....@hotmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>  Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>  > Use the "struct update" syntax to initialize most of the fields to zero,
>  > and simplify the handmade type-checking of $name.
>  >
>  > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>  > ---
>  >  rust/qemu-api/src/device_class.rs | 29 ++++++-----------------------
>  >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>  >
>  > diff --git a/rust/qemu-api/src/device_class.rs 
> b/rust/qemu-api/src/device_class.rs
>  > index 2219b9f73d0..5aba426d243 100644
>  > --- a/rust/qemu-api/src/device_class.rs
>  > +++ b/rust/qemu-api/src/device_class.rs
>  > @@ -29,44 +29,27 @@ macro_rules! device_class_init {
>  >  macro_rules! define_property {
>  >      ($name:expr, $state:ty, $field:expr, $prop:expr, $type:expr, default 
> = $defval:expr$(,)*) => {
>  >          $crate::bindings::Property {
>  > -            name: {
>  > -                #[used]
>  > -                static _TEMP: &::core::ffi::CStr = $name;
>  > -                _TEMP.as_ptr()
>  > -            },
>  > +            // use associated function syntax for type checking
>  > +            name: ::core::ffi::CStr::as_ptr($name),
>  >              info: $prop,
>  >              offset: ::core::mem::offset_of!($state, $field)
>  >                  .try_into()
>  >                  .expect("Could not fit offset value to type"),
>  > -            bitnr: 0,
>  > -            bitmask: 0,
>  >              set_default: true,
>  >              defval: $crate::bindings::Property__bindgen_ty_1 { u: 
> $defval.into() },
>  > -            arrayoffset: 0,
>  > -            arrayinfo: ::core::ptr::null(),
>  > -            arrayfieldsize: 0,
>  > -            link_type: ::core::ptr::null(),
>  > +            ..unsafe { 
> ::core::mem::MaybeUninit::<$crate::bindings::Property>::zeroed().assume_init()
>  }
>
>  zeroed() is const only since 1.75.0 [1]. Is there any alternative for
>  older Rust versions?
>
> Yes: manual implementation of a Zeroable trait, as in the series I sent 
> before one. For now I am not worrying about the MSRV, since the 
> hacks/workarounds from those patches do not become any worse.

Ah, yes, I should have recalled seeing that earlier.

Reviewed-by: Junjie Mao <junjie....@hotmail.com>

--
Best Regards
Junjie Mao

Reply via email to