On 9/12/24 21:36, p...@philjordan.eu wrote:
From: Phil Dennis-Jordan <p...@philjordan.eu>

Printing a sequence of bytes as hex with leading zeroes omitted just looks odd.

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>


Signed-off-by: Phil Dennis-Jordan <p...@philjordan.eu>
---
  target/i386/hvf/x86_decode.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/x86_decode.c b/target/i386/hvf/x86_decode.c
index 6c7cfc820f..f8d37f2d53 100644
--- a/target/i386/hvf/x86_decode.c
+++ b/target/i386/hvf/x86_decode.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void decode_invalid(CPUX86State *env, struct 
x86_decode *decode)
  {
      printf("%llx: failed to decode instruction ", env->eip);
      for (int i = 0; i < decode->opcode_len; i++) {
-        printf("%x ", decode->opcode[i]);
+        printf("%02x ", decode->opcode[i]);
      }
      printf("\n");

Maybe we should use monitor_printf() here?

      VM_PANIC("decoder failed\n");


Reply via email to