Am Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:46:11 +0000
schrieb Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>:
> This is to allow the RTC functionality to be maintained within its own
> separate
> device rather than as part of the next-pc device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>
> ---
> hw/m68k/next-cube.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/m68k/next-cube.c b/hw/m68k/next-cube.c
> index 9c91ee146a..c947af65e2 100644
> --- a/hw/m68k/next-cube.c
> +++ b/hw/m68k/next-cube.c
...
> @@ -1078,6 +1115,12 @@ static void next_pc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> }
> sysbus_connect_irq(sbd, 0, qdev_get_gpio_in(dev, NEXT_SCC_I));
> sysbus_connect_irq(sbd, 1, qdev_get_gpio_in(dev, NEXT_SCC_DMA_I));
> +
> + /* RTC */
> + d = DEVICE(object_resolve_path_component(OBJECT(dev), "rtc"));
> + if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(d), errp)) {
> + return;
> + }
> }
Would it be easier to directly use s->rtc instead of taking the detour via
object_resolve_path_component?
Thomas
