On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is a follow-up to my previous patch: it turns
> out that a single mb() isn't sufficient as network
> loss could still be triggered under stress.
>
> Patch 1 is repost of v1.
>
> The following two patches fix more races found
> by code inspection and comparison with vhost
> in kernel. After applying these
> patches, no more network loss was observed.
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin (3):
>  virtio: add missing mb() on notification
>  virtio: add missing mb() on enable notification
>  virtio: order index/descriptor reads
>
>  hw/virtio.c    |   11 +++++++++++
>  qemu-barrier.h |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reply via email to