On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:33 PM Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
>
> 21.01.2025 20:06, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In this new version, in patch 2,  we're using the address 'size' val from
> > riscv_cpu_tlb_fill() instead of infering it from the CPU XLEN.
> >
> > No other changes made. Patches based on master.
> >
> > Changes from v2:
> > - patch 2:
> >    - use 'size' instead of infering wp_len using the CPU XLEN
> > - v2 link: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20250120204910.1317013-1-dbarb...@ventanamicro.com/
> >
> > Daniel Henrique Barboza (2):
> >    target/riscv/debug.c: use wp size = 4 for 32-bit CPUs
> >    target/riscv: throw debug exception before page fault
>
> Hi!
>
> Is this a qemu-stable material?

Yes

>
> If yes, is it worth to pick it up for older stable series
> (currently active series are 7.2 and 8.2)?

If it applies then it probably is

>
> Please keep Cc: qemu-stable@ for fixes which should be picked up
> for the stable series.

Sorry, I always forget :(

Alistair

>
> Thanks,
>
> /mjt
>

Reply via email to