On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:39 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:20:11PM +0000, T.J. Alumbaugh wrote:
> > This is the device implementation for the proposed expanded balloon feature
> > described here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230509185419.1088297-1-yuan...@google.com/
> >
> > This series has a fixed number of "bins" for the working set report, but 
> > this is
> > not a constraint of the system. The bin number is fixed at device 
> > realization
> > time (in other implementations it is specified as a command line argument). 
> > Once
> > that number is fixed, this determines the correct number of bin intervals to
> > pass to the QMP/HMP function 'working_set_config'. Any feedback on how to
> > properly construct that function for this use case (passing a variable 
> > length
> > list?) would be appreciated.
>
> It's been a while. Is there interest is reviving this? I also note that
> reserving a feature bit is very much recommended to avoid a complete
> mess.
Thanks for the reminder Michael! I've been informed [1] that this
should be brought up in VIRTIO TC, but I haven't gotten around to this
yet. Should I send a patch to this mailing list or a proposal to
virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org to reserve a feature bit?

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20241127025728.3689245-10-yuan...@google.com/

Reply via email to