On 5/15/25 17:43, John Levon wrote:
All of the cleanup can be done in the same place, and vfio-user will
want to do the same.
Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.le...@nutanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
Thanks,
C.
---
hw/vfio/pci.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index a1bfdfe375..d96b55f80c 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -2854,6 +2854,18 @@ static bool vfio_populate_device(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev,
Error **errp)
static void vfio_pci_put_device(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
{
+ vfio_display_finalize(vdev);
+ vfio_bars_finalize(vdev);
+ g_free(vdev->emulated_config_bits);
+ g_free(vdev->rom);
+ /*
+ * XXX Leaking igd_opregion is not an oversight, we can't remove the
+ * fw_cfg entry therefore leaking this allocation seems like the safest
+ * option.
+ *
+ * g_free(vdev->igd_opregion);
+ */
+
vfio_device_detach(&vdev->vbasedev);
g_free(vdev->vbasedev.name);
@@ -3302,17 +3314,6 @@ static void vfio_instance_finalize(Object *obj)
{
VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = VFIO_PCI_BASE(obj);
- vfio_display_finalize(vdev);
- vfio_bars_finalize(vdev);
- g_free(vdev->emulated_config_bits);
- g_free(vdev->rom);
- /*
- * XXX Leaking igd_opregion is not an oversight, we can't remove the
- * fw_cfg entry therefore leaking this allocation seems like the safest
- * option.
- *
- * g_free(vdev->igd_opregion);
- */
vfio_pci_put_device(vdev);
}