On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 02:04, kft...@nuvoton.com <kft...@nuvoton.com> wrote:
>
> Hi PMM:
>
> From: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2025 9:42 PM
> To: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: CS20 KFTing <kft...@nuvoton.com>; qemu-...@nongnu.org; 
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Hao Wu <wuhao...@google.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/arm: Add missing psci_conduit to NPCM8XX SoC boot info
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 19:54, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/18/25 09:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 at 14:20, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Without psci_conduit, the Linux kernel crashes almost immediately.
> > >>
> > >>      psci: probing for conduit method from DT.
> > >>      Internal error: Oops - Undefined instruction: 0000000002000000
> > >> [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: ae0c4d1a1290 ("hw/arm: Add NPCM8XX SoC")
> > >> Cc: Hao Wu <wuhao...@google.com>
> > >> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
> > >> ---
> > >>   hw/arm/npcm8xx.c | 1 +
> > >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/arm/npcm8xx.c b/hw/arm/npcm8xx.c index
> > >> f182accc47..e5a1929ed7 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/arm/npcm8xx.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/arm/npcm8xx.c
> > >> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static struct arm_boot_info npcm8xx_binfo = {
> > >>       .secure_boot            = false,
> > >>       .board_id               = -1,
> > >>       .board_setup_addr       = NPCM8XX_BOARD_SETUP_ADDR,
> > >> +    .psci_conduit           = QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC,
> > >>   };
> > >
> > > Why do we need this for npcm8xx when we don't need it for npcm7xx?
> > > Or is it also broken on 7xx?
> > >
> >
> > I don't see a reference to psci in npcm7xx devicetree files in the
> > upstream Linux kernel.

> > I guess the aarch32 versions of the board don't use psci and the aarch64 
> > one does.
>
> > Would any of the Nuvoton folks like to comment on this patch?
> > It looks like a correct fix to me.


> Yes, the aarch64 uses psci.

Thanks for confirming; I've applied this to target-arm.next.

-- PMM

Reply via email to