Am 15.05.2012 12:16, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
> On Tue, 15 May 2012, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 14.05.2012 16:57, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
>>> On Mon, 14 May 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> While for the "normal" case (called from blk_send_response_all())
>>>> decrementing requests_finished is correct, doing so in the parse error
>>>> case is wrong; requests_inflight needs to be decremented instead.
>>>>
>>>> Change in v2: Adjust coding style.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>
>>
>> Aren't you going to send a pull request yourself, Stefano?
> 
> Yes, I am: I am collecting a series of Xen patches for 1.1 and I am
> aiming at sending a single pull request by the end of the week.
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=133701567429388&w=2

Ok, great.

I was just wondering because I always understood an Acked-by as a
message to the maintainer who picks the patch up, so I wasn't sure if
you expected me to do it and the patch would fall through the cracks.

Kevin

Reply via email to