Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c        | 10 ++++++++--
>  docs/system/arm/emulation.rst |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
> index 5d8ed2794d..f73729926b 100644
> --- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
> @@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj)
>       */
>      t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, MTE, 3);       /* FEAT_MTE3 */
>      t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, RAS_FRAC, 0);  /* FEAT_RASv1p1 + 
> FEAT_DoubleFault */
> -    t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, SME, 1);       /* FEAT_SME */
> +    t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, SME, 2);       /* FEAT_SME2 */

With -cpu max moving to SME2 is there any way to test just plain SME
now?

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro

Reply via email to