On 8/4/25 7:23 AM, Mohamed Mediouni wrote:
winhvemulation is x86_64 only.In the future, we might want to get rid of winhvemulation usage entirely. Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mediouni <moha...@unpredictable.fr> --- accel/whpx/whpx-common.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- include/system/whpx-common.h | 2 ++ include/system/whpx-internal.h | 7 ++++++- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/accel/whpx/whpx-common.c b/accel/whpx/whpx-common.c index b5e5fda696..e2d692126a 100644 --- a/accel/whpx/whpx-common.c +++ b/accel/whpx/whpx-common.c @@ -141,9 +143,7 @@ int whpx_first_vcpu_starting(CPUState *cpu) */ int whpx_last_vcpu_stopping(CPUState *cpu) { -#ifdef __x86_64__ whpx_apply_breakpoints(whpx_global.breakpoints.breakpoints, cpu, false); -#endif return 0;
Rebase mistake? This was added with previous commit, but I don't think it was intended. Else, Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org>
