Hi Guan,
> +void cpu_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> +{
> + int i;
> + CPUUniCore32State *env = (CPUUniCore32State *)opaque;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->regs[i]);
> + }
> + qemu_put_be32(f, cpu_asr_read(env));
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->bsr);
> + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->banked_bsr[i]);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->banked_r29[i]);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->banked_r30[i]);
> + }
> +
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c0_cpuid);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c0_cachetype);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c1_sys);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c2_base);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c3_faultstatus);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c4_faultaddr);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c5_cacheop);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->cp0.c6_tlbop);
> +
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->features);
> +
> + if (env->features & UC32_HWCAP_UCF64) {
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + CPU_DoubleU u;
> + u.d = env->ucf64.regs[i];
> + qemu_put_be32(f, u.l.upper);
> + qemu_put_be32(f, u.l.lower);
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> + qemu_put_be32(f, env->ucf64.xregs[i]);
> + }
> + }
> +}
Do you think use VMState rather then QEMUFile is a good idea?
I saw OpenRISC target got this kind of feedback before [1].
Regards,
chenwj
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-05/msg02457.html
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
