On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:38 AM Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Am 10.09.2025 um 18:08 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> > Am 10.09.2025 um 17:16 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
> > > luks-detached-header   fail       [17:15:26] [17:15:38]   12.2s
>         failed, exit status 1
> > > ---
> /home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/luks-detached-header.out
> > > +++
> /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/luks-file-luks-detached-header/luks-detached-header.out.bad
> > > @@ -1,5 +1,55 @@
> > > -..
> > > +EE
> > > +======================================================================
> > > +ERROR: test_detached_luks_header
> (__main__.TestDetachedLUKSHeader.test_detached_luks_header)
> > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > +Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > +  File
> "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/luks-detached-header",
> line 139, in setUp
> > > +    res = qemu_img_create(
> > > +          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line
> 278, in qemu_img_create
> > > +    return qemu_img('create', *args)
> > > +           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line
> 261, in qemu_img
> > > +    return qemu_tool(*full_args, check=check,
> combine_stdio=combine_stdio)
> > > +
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line
> 241, in qemu_tool
> > > +    raise VerboseProcessError(
> > > +qemu.utils.VerboseProcessError: Command
> '('/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/qemu-img', 'create', '-f', 'luks', '-o',
> 'iter-time=10', '-o', 'key-secret=sec0', '-o', 'detached-header=true',
> '--object', 'secret,id=sec0,data=foo',
> '/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/luks-file-luks-detached-header/detached_header.img2')'
> returned non-zero exit status 1.
> > > +  ┏━ output
> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
> > > +  ┃ Formatting
> '/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/l
> > > +  ┃ uks-file-luks-detached-header/detached_header.img2', fmt=luks
> > > +  ┃ size=-1 key-secret=sec0 iter-time=10 detached-header=true
> > > +  ┃ qemu-img:
> /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/luk
> > > +  ┃ s-file-luks-detached-header/detached_header.img2: Parameter
> > > +  ┃ 'detached-header' is unexpected
> > > +
> ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
> >
> > This one is surprising. I don't think anything relevant in the luks
> > driver has changed since the test was introduced. At the same time, the
> > code clearly has a problem when it tries to convert a QemuOpts
> > containing a "detached-header" option into a QAPI object when the schema
> > doesn't even have this option. Was this broken from the beginning? Would
> > have been for a year and half.
>
> I bisected this one because I was curious how this could happen, and it
> was broken quite explicitly by commit e818c01a:
>
> commit e818c01ae6e7c54c7019baaf307be59d99ce80b9 (HEAD)
> Author: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> Date:   Mon Feb 19 15:12:59 2024 +0000
>
>     qapi: drop unused QCryptoBlockCreateOptionsLUKS.detached-header
>
>     The 'detached-header' field in QCryptoBlockCreateOptionsLUKS
>     was left over from earlier patch iterations.
>
>     Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
>
> The test case demonstrates that it actually wasn't unused.
>
> If we don't want to reintroduce the field in QAPI, we need to explicitly
>

Keeping the detached-header option is more convenient for users when

creating a detached-header image.

My inclination is to bring this optionback.  Any suggestions? cc @Daniel P.
Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>


> delete it from the QemuOpts in block_crypto_co_create_opts_luks() before
> block_crypto_create_opts_init() creates a QCryptoBlockCreateOptions from
> the given options and fails now that this option doesn't exist any more.
>
> Kevin
>
>

-- 
Best regards

Reply via email to