On 05/30/2012 03:12 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/09/2012 10:12 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Peter Maydell wrote:
On 9 May 2012 15:01, Jim Meyering<j...@meyering.net> wrote:
From 402100deb7e27b1d7ac619ebac963f861fae91b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering<meyer...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:34:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] linux-user: remove two unchecked uses of strdup
Remove two uses of strdup (use g_path_get_basename instead),
and add a comment that this strncpy use is ok.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering<meyer...@redhat.com>
This version
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell<peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
but you'll need to retransmit it (presumably as part of a v2
of this series) so it is in the proper format for a patch email
(otherwise all the conversational chatter ends up in the git
commit message).
Thanks again.
I'm amending to reflect ACKs and Reviewed-by: comments as they come in,
as well as corrections like yours.
I expect to repost the whole series (or any subset) when appropriate.
Or I can push it to a publicly-accessible repository somewhere.
Has this gotten reposted? I don't see a new version on the list.
Hi Anthony,
I've reposted (as V2, V3, etc.) any individual patch that required revision,
but have not reposted the series. I would have reposted, but I recall
someone saying that their tools managed quite well with the one-off
reposts.
I corrected myself later as I misunderstood your question. It handles the
acked-bys but not partial updates to a patch series.
Would you like me to repost just this one or the whole 22-patch series?
Could you please repost the full series?
Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
