Generally we want to clarify terminology and avoid confusions,
prefering @start with (exclusive) @end, and base @addr with
@length (for inclusive range).

Here as cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty() operates on a range,
rename @start as @addr.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
---
 include/system/ram_addr.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/system/ram_addr.h b/include/system/ram_addr.h
index f74a0ecee56..585ed78c767 100644
--- a/include/system/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/system/ram_addr.h
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static inline void qemu_ram_block_writeback(RAMBlock *block)
 #define DIRTY_CLIENTS_ALL     ((1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM) - 1)
 #define DIRTY_CLIENTS_NOCODE  (DIRTY_CLIENTS_ALL & ~(1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE))
 
-static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t start,
+static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t addr,
                                                  ram_addr_t length,
                                                  unsigned client)
 {
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t 
start,
 
     assert(client < DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM);
 
-    end = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(start + length) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
-    page = start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+    end = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(addr + length) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+    page = addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
 
     WITH_RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD() {
         blocks = qatomic_rcu_read(&ram_list.dirty_memory[client]);
-- 
2.51.0


Reply via email to