On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 at 21:09, Richard Henderson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> HVF has not yet enabled 128-bit system registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
> ---
>  target/arm/hvf/hvf.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
> index 0658a99a2d..aa42fa09c3 100644
> --- a/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
> +++ b/target/arm/hvf/hvf.c
> @@ -897,6 +897,9 @@ int hvf_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>      env->aarch64 = true;
>      asm volatile("mrs %0, cntfrq_el0" : "=r"(arm_cpu->gt_cntfrq_hz));
>
> +    /* No support yet for FEAT_D128 */
> +    assert(arm_cpu->cpreg128_array_len == 0);
> +
>      /* Allocate enough space for our sysreg sync */
>      arm_cpu->cpreg_indexes = g_renew(uint64_t, arm_cpu->cpreg_indexes,
>                                       sregs_match_len);
> @@ -920,6 +923,7 @@ int hvf_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>
>          if (ri) {
>              assert(!(ri->type & ARM_CP_NO_RAW));
> +            assert(!(ri->type & ARM_CP_128BIT));
>              arm_cpu->cpreg_indexes[sregs_cnt++] = kvm_id;
>          }


Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to