On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 at 10:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> wrote: > > The VirtMachineClass::kvm_no_adjvtime field was only used by the > virt-4.2 machine, which got removed. Remove it as now unused, but > keep the ARMCPU homonym property. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> > --- > include/hw/arm/virt.h | 1 - > hw/arm/virt.c | 5 ----- > 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h > index 993872bb680..c77a33f6df2 100644 > --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h > +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h > @@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ struct VirtMachineClass { > MachineClass parent; > bool no_tcg_its; > bool no_highmem_compact; > - bool kvm_no_adjvtime; > bool no_kvm_steal_time; > bool acpi_expose_flash; > bool no_secure_gpio; > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > index b781a218019..ffbddb711f6 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > @@ -2362,11 +2362,6 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) > object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL); > } > > - if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime && > - object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) { > - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL); > - } > - > if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time && > object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) { > object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
Can we / should we start the deprecate-and-drop process for the CPU kvm-no-adjvtime property now ? -- PMM
