On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 12:24 PM Chen Miao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/28/2025 6:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:18 AM chenmiao <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> In irq.rs, we added a new get method for the InterruptSource type to
> >> determine
> >> whether an InterruptSource is null. This eliminates the need to repeatedly
> >> call self.cell.get().is_null() for null checks during comparisons.
> >> Additionally, we exposed the slice_as_ptrmethod to support external usage
> >> with
> >> the &[InterruptSource]type.
> >>
> >> In qdev.rs, we implemented the init_gpio_out_namedfunction, which
> >> corresponds
> >> to the C function qdev_init_gpio_out_named. We also refactored the
> >> init_gpio_outfunction to reuse the init_gpio_out_namedinterface.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: chenmiao <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> rust/hw/core/src/irq.rs | 6 +++++-
> >> rust/hw/core/src/qdev.rs | 12 +++++++++---
> >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/rust/hw/core/src/irq.rs b/rust/hw/core/src/irq.rs
> >> index e0d7784d97..dd5d0cadbc 100644
> >> --- a/rust/hw/core/src/irq.rs
> >> +++ b/rust/hw/core/src/irq.rs
> >> @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ pub fn pulse(&self) {
> >> pub fn raise(&self) {
> >> self.set(true);
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + pub fn get(&self) -> bool {
> >> + !self.cell.get().is_null()
> >> + }
> > This should not be get(), but "is_connected()". Also it should be
> > implemented for any T, therefore in the "impl<T> InterruptSource<T>"
> > block below.
> I'll fix it later.
You can drop it actually (see review of 5/5).
> >> }
> >>
> >> impl<T> InterruptSource<T>
> >> @@ -91,7 +95,7 @@ pub(crate) const fn as_ptr(&self) -> *mut *mut
> >> bindings::IRQState {
> >> self.cell.as_ptr()
> >> }
> >>
> >> - pub(crate) const fn slice_as_ptr(slice: &[Self]) -> *mut *mut
> >> bindings::IRQState {
> >> + pub const fn slice_as_ptr(slice: &[Self]) -> *mut *mut
> >> bindings::IRQState {
> >> assert!(!slice.is_empty());
> >> slice[0].as_ptr()
> >> }
> > Since you are not using this, you don't need to expose it outside the crate.
>
> I have used this function in the next patch.
Isn't it commented out? The code that is used is:
+ self.init_gpio_in(self.handler_size(), PCF8574State::gpio_set);
+ self.init_gpio_out(from_ref(&self.handler[0]));
+ self.init_gpio_out_named(from_ref(&self.intrq), "nINT", 1);