On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:59 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:33:31AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Aside: "format for humans" may well be more widely applicable, if we > > care. > > The scope of the DEV.FN hack is worse than that - with PCI addresses, > while most of the time we just pass DEV, the QAPI also accepts it in > DEV.FN format for the 'addr' property and libvirt relies on that.
That's fine, it's "just" a QAPI alternate type. A bit weird, but it works and is used by other QAPI side. The getter (printing) side is where the mess is. Paolo
