On 30/10/25 13:32, Anton Johansson wrote:
On 29/10/25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 27/10/25 13:35, Anton Johansson wrote:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anton Johansson <[email protected]>
---
hw/riscv/riscv-iommu.c | 6 ++++--
hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
index c7e98a4308..65d2c92018 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static bool csr_qtest_callback(CharBackend *chr, gchar
**words)
g_assert(rc == 0);
csr_call(words[1], cpu, csr, &val);
- qtest_sendf(chr, "OK 0 "TARGET_FMT_lx"\n", (target_ulong)val);
+ qtest_sendf(chr, "OK 0 %"PRIx64"\n", val);
return true;
}
What about csr_call()?
csr_call() is handled in the other series making cpu.h target agnostic,
there we expose 64 bit variants of reading/writing CSRs which are then
used by csr_call().
Ah, good then, thanks!
