> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger <[email protected]>
> Sent: 03 November 2025 14:58
> To: Shameer Kolothum <[email protected]>; qemu-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>; Nicolin
> Chen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Nathan Chen <[email protected]>; Matt Ochs <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Krishnakant Jaju <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/32] hw/arm/virt: Set PCI preserve_config for accel
> SMMUv3
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On 10/31/25 11:49 AM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Introduce a new pci_preserve_config field in virt machine state which
> > allows  the generation of DSM #5. This field is only set if accel SMMU
> > is instantiated.
> >
> > In a subsequent patch, SMMUv3 accel mode will make use of IORT RMR
> > nodes to enable nested translation of MSI doorbell addresses. IORT RMR
> > requires _DSM #5 to be set for the PCI host bridge so that the Guest
> > kernel preserves the PCI boot configuration.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  hw/arm/virt.c            | 4 ++++
> >  include/hw/arm/virt.h    | 1 +
> >  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c index
> > 8bb6b60515..d51da6e27d 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > @@ -163,6 +163,14 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_pci(Aml *scope, const
> MemMapEntry *memmap,
> >          .pci_native_hotplug = !acpi_pcihp,
> >      };
> >
> > +    /*
> > +     * Accel SMMU requires RMRs for MSI 1-1 mapping, which require _DSM
> for
> > +     * preserving PCI Boot Configurations
> as suggested in v4 you can be more precise and explictly state
> 
> _DSM function 5 (Ignore PCI Boot Configuration)

Ok. Will update.

> 
> > +     */
> > +    if (vms->pci_preserve_config) {
> > +        cfg.preserve_config = true;
> > +    }
> > +
> >      if (vms->highmem_mmio) {
> >          cfg.mmio64 = memmap[VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_MMIO];
> >      }
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index
> > 175023897a..8a347a6e39 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> > @@ -3091,6 +3091,10 @@ static void
> virt_machine_device_plug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> >              }
> >
> >              create_smmuv3_dev_dtb(vms, dev, bus);
> > +            if (object_property_find(OBJECT(dev), "accel") &&
> why do you need to test
> 
> object_property_find(OBJECT(dev), "accel")?

Looks like you probably found the reason now 😉. 

Anyway for the record, we don't have the "accel" property yet and 
is only introduced in 25/32. Without the above check the "make check "
tests will report error. This will be removed once we introduce the
property.

> 
> > +                object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(dev), "accel", 
> > &error_abort)) {
> > +                vms->pci_preserve_config = true;
> > +            }
> >          }
> >      }
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h index
> > 04a09af354..60db5d40b2 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> > @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ struct VirtMachineState {
> >      bool ns_el2_virt_timer_irq;
> >      CXLState cxl_devices_state;
> >      bool legacy_smmuv3_present;
> > +    bool pci_preserve_config;
> >  };
> >
> >  #define VIRT_ECAM_ID(high) (high ? VIRT_HIGH_PCIE_ECAM :
> > VIRT_PCIE_ECAM)
> With those changes takin into account
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Shameer

Reply via email to