On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 09:49:35AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Test, that fix in previous commit make sense.

"previous commit" is ambiguous, when this patch is not part of a
larger series. Maybe use the term "recent commit" and call out its
title and/or commit hash?

> +++ b/tests/unit/test-cutils.c
> @@ -3626,6 +3626,44 @@ static void test_si_prefix(void)
>      g_assert_cmpstr(si_prefix(18), ==, "E");
>  }
>  
> +static void test_qemu_hexdump_alignment(void)
> +{
> +    /*
> +     * Test that ASCII part is properly aligned for incomplete lines.
> +     * This test catches the bug that was fixed in previous commit
> +     * "util/hexdump: fix QEMU_HEXDUMP_LINE_WIDTH logic".

Ah - that's the line I was expecting in the commit message; and I
found commit 20aa05ed from there.


-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libguestfs.org


Reply via email to