On Thu, Nov 13 2025, Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> + #define MAX_CPREG_VMSTATE_ANOMALIES 10 >>> + uint64_t cpreg_vmstate_missing_indexes[MAX_CPREG_VMSTATE_ANOMALIES]; >>> + int32_t cpreg_vmstate_missing_indexes_array_len; >>> + uint64_t cpreg_vmstate_unexpected_indexes[MAX_CPREG_VMSTATE_ANOMALIES]; >>> + int32_t cpreg_vmstate_unexpected_indexes_array_len; >> "indices"? > > Originally we had > uint64_t *cpreg_vmstate_indexes; > so I reused the same terminology > > As a non native english speaker I don't know if the usage is wrong. I > thought some references on the net though
Not a native English speaker, either; wiktionary says both are valid, so probably a matter of taste.
