> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> Sent: 20 November 2025 20:51
> To: Shameer Kolothum <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Jason Gunthorpe
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Nathan
> Chen <[email protected]>; Matt Ochs <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Krishnakant Jaju <[email protected]>; Michael S . Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/33] hw/pci/pci: Add optional
> supports_address_space() callback
> 
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 01:21:48PM +0000, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Introduce an optional supports_address_space() callback in PCIIOMMUOps
> to
> 
> "supports_address_space" sounds a bit to wide to me than its
> indication to supporting an IOMMU address space specifically,
> since the "system address space" being used in this series is
> a legit address space as well.
> 
> With that being said, I think we are fine for now, given the
> API docs has clarified it. If someone shares the same concern,
> we can rename it later.

The intent here is just to let the vIOMMU decide whether a device should
be associated with its address_space before we call get_address_space().
If the check passes, the vIOMMU must provide the actual address_space
through get_address_space() callback.

Sure. Open to suggestion here.

Thanks,
Shameer

Reply via email to