Peter Maydell <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 at 12:01, Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> wrote: >> The other thing that plays in here is that we actively encourage use of >> g_autoptr everywhere. It is very unusual for "Error" to be a type that >> does NOT want g_autoptr, and thus the mistake is very much on the cards. >> >> I've proposed it before myself & Markus caught it. I also caught one >> other proposals to add it since my attempt. This third time it slipped >> through review. I expect we'll see a 4th attempt to add it at some point. > > We could add a comment to the header explaining the rationale for > not providing a g_autoptr handler, so that at least we have it > written down, and are more likely to remember it when it comes > up again in future...
Good idea. I'll take care of it.
