On Tuesday, 2 December 2025 14:21:32 CET [email protected] wrote: > Correct comment typo in xen_9pfs_bh() > > Signed-off-by: Alano Song <[email protected]>
Please send a set of associated patches with a cover letter next time. It makes it easier for people when they are threaded together. I assume this patch can also be pushed through qemu-trivial, so: Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <[email protected]> Otherwise let me know and I'll push it through my 9p queue. /Christian > --- > hw/9pfs/xen-9p-backend.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/9pfs/xen-9p-backend.c b/hw/9pfs/xen-9p-backend.c > index 79359d911a..ca0fff5fa9 100644 > --- a/hw/9pfs/xen-9p-backend.c > +++ b/hw/9pfs/xen-9p-backend.c > @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void xen_9pfs_bh(void *opaque) > > again: > wait = ring->co != NULL && qemu_coroutine_entered(ring->co); > - /* paired with the smb_wmb barriers in xen_9pfs_init_in_iov_from_pdu */ > + /* paired with the smp_wmb barriers in xen_9pfs_init_in_iov_from_pdu > */ smp_rmb(); > if (wait) { > cpu_relax();
