Hi,

Thanks for Daniel and Conor's reviews. In PATCH v2, I have fixed the issues
they mentioned:

- Patch 1: Add Svpbmt extension support for the T-Head C908 CPU
- Patch 2: Move the k230.rst definition from MAINTAINERS to Patch 5
- Patch 5: Apply Daniel's bugfix to build the k230 documentation successfully

PATCH v1 changelog:
- Patch1: Add T-Head C908 and C908v CPU support
- Patch2: Add K230 board initial support(big core is not supported yet)
- Patch3: Add Programmable Watchdog Timer (WDT) peripheral support
- Patch4: Add QEMU test for K230 watchdog
- Patch5: Add documentation for K230 machine
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/T/#t


Thanks,
Chao

Chao Liu (5):
  target/riscv: add thead-c908 cpu support
  hw/riscv: add k230 board initial support
  hw/watchdog: add k230 watchdog initial support
  tests/qtest: add test for K230 watchdog
  docs/system/riscv: add documentation for k230 machine

 MAINTAINERS                    |  10 +
 docs/system/riscv/k230.rst     |  48 ++++
 docs/system/target-riscv.rst   |   1 +
 hw/riscv/Kconfig               |  11 +
 hw/riscv/k230.c                | 501 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/riscv/meson.build           |   2 +-
 hw/watchdog/Kconfig            |   4 +
 hw/watchdog/k230_wdt.c         | 307 ++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/watchdog/meson.build        |   1 +
 hw/watchdog/trace-events       |   9 +
 include/hw/riscv/k230.h        | 153 ++++++++++
 include/hw/watchdog/k230_wdt.h | 130 +++++++++
 target/riscv/cpu-qom.h         |   2 +
 target/riscv/cpu.c             |  44 +++
 target/riscv/th_csr.c          | 380 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 tests/qtest/k230-wdt-test.c    | 199 +++++++++++++
 tests/qtest/meson.build        |   3 +-
 17 files changed, 1802 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 docs/system/riscv/k230.rst
 create mode 100644 hw/riscv/k230.c
 create mode 100644 hw/watchdog/k230_wdt.c
 create mode 100644 include/hw/riscv/k230.h
 create mode 100644 include/hw/watchdog/k230_wdt.h
 create mode 100644 tests/qtest/k230-wdt-test.c

-- 
2.51.0


Reply via email to