> On Dec 5, 2025, at 12:43 AM, Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 12/4/25 20:45, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
>>>> On Dec 2, 2025, at 11:42 PM, Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>> On 11/26/25 11:24, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>> There are no functional tests for the 'fby35' machine which makes
>>>> harder to determine when something becomes deprecated or unused.
>>>> The 'fby35' machine was originally added as an example of a multi-SoC
>>>> system, with the expectation the models would evolve over time in an
>>>> heterogeneous system. This hasn't happened and no public firmware is
>>>> available to boot it. It can be replaced by the 'ast2700fc', another
>>>> multi-SoC machine based on the newer AST2700 SoCs which are excepted
>>>> to receive better support in the future.
>>>> Cc: Peter Delevoryas <[email protected]>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> No objections ? If not, I will queue the deprecation for QEMU 10.2.
>>> Since deprecation is tolerated in the -rc phase.
>> Oh hey, sorry I missed the original email, yeah no objections! Totally fair.
>> :) We’re not using this internally either, we’ve mostly ended up pursuing
>> multi-process solutions.
>
> Could we have your Acked-by then ?
Oh sure, ehh:
Acked-by: Peter Delevoryas <[email protected]>
>
>> Even though I think single-process stuff is interesting, getting multi
>> master i2c to work between socs in the same process can be tricky.
>
> Yeah. This is still WIP. Making good progres though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> C.
>
>
