Il 09/07/2012 21:17, miny...@acm.org ha scritto:
> From: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com>
> 
> This lets devices that don't care about their interrupt number, like
> IPMI, just grab any unused interrupt.

I would try to avoid this.  It is too dependent on the actual
initialization order and command line.  Just pick a reasonable value for
the interrupt (5?) and make it customizable.

I only gave a cursory look at the series, but it looks really well done
except for command-line parsing.  I'll reply to the patches individually.

Paolo



Reply via email to