Il 09/07/2012 21:17, miny...@acm.org ha scritto: > From: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com> > > This lets devices that don't care about their interrupt number, like > IPMI, just grab any unused interrupt.
I would try to avoid this. It is too dependent on the actual initialization order and command line. Just pick a reasonable value for the interrupt (5?) and make it customizable. I only gave a cursory look at the series, but it looks really well done except for command-line parsing. I'll reply to the patches individually. Paolo