On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:41:01 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 26/07/2012 17:26, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: > >> The DeviceNotActive error is not a particularly good match, add > >> > a separate one. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > Luiz, what do you think about this one? It seems to contradict the idea > > of having only few error classes and free form error descriptions. > > I agree, but that's what we have to live with for now... Why don't you add QERR_INVALID_STATE then? > > > What's the error class that we should really have here? A general > > QERR_NOT_ACTIVE? > > See my proposal here: > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg00061.html > (totally ignored ;)). > > This would be QERR_INVALID_STATE (quoting from that message: > "InvalidStateError is generally caused by the interaction with other > commands, could be fixed by sending some commands and retrying"). > > Paolo >
