Am 26.07.2012 18:37, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:03:20 +0200 > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Il 26/07/2012 17:54, Markus Armbruster ha scritto: >>> Unlike Anthony, I think this is a move in the right direction. >> >> Me too, but I would like to understand how it fits with the >> qapi-schema-errors.json. Do we actually need a schema if the messages >> are flat? > > Yes, we need it because we still an error object to obey (ie. the data > member). > > But we're talking about dropping that, so it might be possible to kill > the schema.
I'm not so familiar with how all this error infrastructure is plugged together... In a different thread that I mentioned recently (and still haven't found in my inbox), we were talking about changing the JSON encoding of errors where unused by libvirt. Specifically we were talking about having a field for the canonical QOM path of the affected object in place of the often-empty device ID. Are you now discussing to drop any such elaborated QMP schemes in place of just one non-parsable human error message string? Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
