On 10 August 2012 17:22, Igor Mitsyanko <i.mitsya...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 08/09/2012 03:54 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> --- a/vmstate.h >> +++ b/vmstate.h >> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_uint64; >> extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_timer; >> extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_buffer; >> extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_unused_buffer; >> +extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_bitmap; >> #define type_check_array(t1,t2,n) ((t1(*)[n])0 - (t2*)0) >> #define type_check_pointer(t1,t2) ((t1**)0 - (t2*)0) >> @@ -411,6 +412,18 @@ extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_unused_buffer; >> .flags = VMS_BUFFER, \ >> } >> +/* _field_size should be a uint32_t field in the _state struct giving >> the > > > "..should be an int32_t.."
Er, yes. This patch should probably go in as part of your series to add save/load to sd.c -- could you just fix this when you resend the patch as part of that, please? thanks -- PMM
