On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:18:11PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 09/20/2012 10:19 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> Again: If you think the feature is non-invasive, send patches against > >> the kernel and QEMU. > >> > > And explain why it is better than what modern HW provides. > > If it's non-invasive (and easily maintainable), it doesn't have to be > better. > > If it were all that it would have been applied already.
--
Gleb.
