On 17 October 2012 19:11, Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > It's dangerously close to bike-shedding, but i don't think qdev belongs > in qom/. It's not core infrastructure. It's the device base class and > belongs IMHO in hw/.
"-user emulators don't get anything from hw/" is one of those semi arbitrary but easily definable lines that I'd prefer it if we didn't break. (Although IIRC there was a directory-renaming proposal recently which maybe defines some different lines instead.) -- PMM