On 17 October 2012 19:11, Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> It's dangerously close to bike-shedding, but i don't think qdev belongs
> in qom/.  It's not core infrastructure.  It's the device base class and
> belongs IMHO in hw/.

"-user emulators don't get anything from hw/" is one of those semi
arbitrary but easily definable lines that I'd prefer it if we didn't
break. (Although IIRC there was a directory-renaming proposal recently
which maybe defines some different lines instead.)

-- PMM


Reply via email to