On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:50:17 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 19/10/2012 15:23, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > >> > > >> > With HMP yes, with QMP no. You just get "An incoming migration is > >> > expected before this command can be executed" and no clue that disks > >> > are encrypted. > > We could move the bdrv_iterate() calls before the RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE check > > in qmp_cont(), but if this patch fixes all the cases you mention then let's > > just apply it. > > I'm all for that. :) I guess it won't have any affects on the -S races.
