On 25 October 2012 21:18, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> The other approach to this would be:
>
> static QEMUMachine pseries_machine = {
> .no_boot_order = 1,
> };
>
> Which I think is what Peter is suggesting. I'm not a huge fan of this
> because it's backwards logic but we already do this for a bunch of other
> things so I can't object too strongly to it.
The other issue is that "cad" is a load of rubbish for half of these
boards, which don't have anything resembling the usual PC boot
devices and probably don't pay attention to -boot anyway. A patch
which only applied a boot order to boards which actually used it
would probably also be rather shorter.
-- PMM
